Previous Page  38 / 132 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 38 / 132 Next Page
Page Background

3 8

PLUMBING CONNECTION

SPRING 2015

PROVISION FOR OVERFLOW IN

EXTERNAL EAVES GUTTERS

T

he design of external eaves gutters has not changed a

lot over the past 150 years and, for the majority of the

houses in Australia, they have functioned as intended.

I have personally been in this industry for over 20 years

while my family have been in it for the better part of 40

years. Needless to say, we have installed external eaves

gutters on thousands of houses and have always known that

gutters must have provision for overflow. As you walk around

any suburban street though, you will notice that most

standard house gutters do not have provision for overflow.

Why has this been allowed to happen in a regulated and

supposedly well-educated industry?

After the release of

AS2180 – 1986 Metal Rainwater goods

– Selection and Installation

we changed the design of our

quad guttering to always run with overflow slots as stated

in

Section 2. Installation, 2.1.2 High-fronted eaves gutters.

It

states:

Where high-fronted eaves gutters are installed, care shall

be taken to ensure that water will not flow back into the roof

or building structure.

NOTE: Methods of preventing this backflow are as follows:

a.

Provision of slots in the front of the guttering.

b.

Provision of a lower level weir overflow at some point in the

drainage system, e.g. rainhead.

c.

Suitable design of flashing and fixing of guttering to the

fascia board.

According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, in the

five year period from July 2009 and June 2014 806,245

houses were approved for construction. Let’s be more than

fair and assume that only 70% had external eaves gutters

– that’s 564,372 houses in a five year period that have been

built in Australia. Little did anyone know that the ‘design’ of

the external eaves gutter did not comply because AS2180 –

1986 was superseded by AS/NZS 3500.3.2: 1998, and then

again by AS/NZS 3500.3: 2003 and now by the new AS/NZS

3500.3: 2015.

AS/NZS 3500.3: 2015 is so riddled with grey areas that

it comes as no surprise that no one has picked this up as

a compliance issue until now. In addition to this, here in

my State there was the move from the industry dedicated

regulator the Plumbing Industry Commission (PIC), to the

all-encompassing Victorian Building Authority (VBA). As a

consequence of that, it appears to have led to a replacement

of experienced plumbers/inspectors, with ‘book smart’

people who had no previous exposure to building, let alone

plumbing.

A colleague from another plumbing company contacted

me over a month ago to ask if I had been pulled up under

the new provision for overflow regulation. I mentioned that

I had no idea what he was talking about. Then, coincidently

at the time of writing, in July, I received a call from the

VBA, telling me that our business had been picked out for a

new snap audit directive which the VBA was now carrying

out on plumbing companies. They asked us to supply them

with details of 40 houses we had issued a certificate of

compliance on.

WITH OUR CHANGING WEATHER PATTERNS, WE CAN EXPECT TO SEE MORE RAIN EVENTS THAT PUT OUR GUTTER

SYSTEMS TO THE TEST. BUT ARE WE ALL READING FROM THE SAME TECHNICAL TEXT BOOK?

PETER COLL

OF

INTERLINE ROOFING QUESTIONS THE CURRENT UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT IS ACTUALLY THE RIGHT APPROACH TO

THIS ISSUE FOR DOMESTIC ROOF/GUTTER INSTALLERS.

Peter Coll of Interline Roofing isn’t sure we’re all reading

from the same regulatory roofing text book.

METAL ROOFING 101

PETER COLL