Previous Page  51 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 51 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

PLUMBING CONNECTION

WINTER 2016 51

There are large penalties for ignoring this requirement – 100

penalty units currently equates to $15,167, in excess of three

times the minimum amount of a major domestic building

contract. This amount can increase from year to year.

Such a contract is required to have certain prescribed

details which are set out in the Act. The Act should be

consulted for these details, failing which, professional

advice is recommended.

One of the most important consequences of the Act

applying is that work completed must meet certain

minimum standards as far as quality of workmanship,

materials, suitability and fitness for stated purpose are

concerned.

These standards cannot be given or taken away.

Inspectors have power to examine and inspect a building

site and building works to ensure builders and or ‘subbies’

comply with the Act and with other applicable laws.

In the event of the Act applying, and thus in a case

where a written contract must be entered into, the dispute

provisions of the Act apply so that in the event of a dispute

arising, that dispute can be conciliated or go the state’s Civil

and Administrative Tribunal.

KNOW YOUR ACT

The relative simplicity of the above statements can be

misleading as there are often cases ‘at the margins’ where

it can be difficult for a builder to know for certain whether

he or she needs to enter into a written domestic building

contract. Having said that, in most cases it is fairly clear.

As stated above, there can be some pretty serious

consequences by builders for non-compliance with these

and other parts of the Domestic Building Contracts Act. In

cases of doubt, it is best to seek professional advice or seek

the assistance of a relevant professional association, such

as the HIA.

Contact:

Paul Cott LLB (Hons), Grad Dip Legal Practice, LLM is a

Senior Associate Lawyer. Working in commercial litigation

for a number of years has seen Paul amass a wealth of

knowledge and experience in building and construction

litigation which he is willing to share. Paul is also a member

of the Building Dispute Practitioners Society.