Previous Page  58 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 58 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

5 8

PLUMBING CONNECTION

AUTUMN 2015

A

sk 10 different pump engineers for their guidelines on

establishing centrifugal pump minimum flow and you

might get ten different answers. Even agreeing on a

basic definition for minimum flow can be problematic.

A definition that at first glance seems more than

reasonable is as follows: The lowest pump flow that can be

maintained continuously without sustaining damage.

So if I always operate my pump above this “minimum

flow” my pump will never wear out, right? Wrong. Pumps

can wear out even if operated at Best Efficiency Point (BEP).

So we have to assume that we are talking about avoiding

accelerated wear. What rate of wear is acceptable? Is it

based on bearing life considerations or is internal erosion

also considered? Where do we draw the line and who decides

on the criteria? Should it be based on vibration criteria?

The American Petroleum Institute Standard API 610 for

the oil and gas industries uses vibration criteria to define

“minimum continuous stable flow” as the lowest flow at

which the pump can operate without exceeding the vibration

limits imposed by this International Standard. This is not a

bad definition because a vibration criterion implies a certain

level of internal havoc within the pump and if we stay away

from bad vibration, the pump must be ok. Sounds good, but

there are a number of pumps that remain externally smooth

at very low flows; even down to zero flow, without exceeding

the API 610 vibration limits. Thus the vibration approach is

not useful in all instances.

What about temperature rise? For some pumps such

as multistage units or when handling liquids that easily

vaporise, temperature rise at low flows may also impose

limits. This can be a particular issue in multistage pumps

that use balance disks or similar devices to control axial

thrust; where the liquid temperature rise may be sufficient

to cause vaporisation when bled back to lower pressure

regions.

Instead of agonising about the best definition right

now, let us instead have a look at what happens inside a

centrifugal pump at various off design flows. See Fig 1.

Fig 1 is generalised but provides a convenient overview

of the symptoms associated with low flow operation issues

such as:

∫ Increased internal turbulence

∫ Recirculation

∫ Increased pressure fluctuations

∫ Increased vibration due to the above

∫ Increased axial thrust – depending on pump hydraulic

balance method

∫ Increased radial thrust; particularly with single volute casings

∫ Temperature rise due to high internal energy loss

∫ We will look at some of these in more detail.

UNDERSTANDING PUMP CURVES

#5: MINIMUM FLOW –

PART ONE

RON ASTALL

DISCUSSES WHAT HAPPENS INSIDE A CENTRIFUGAL PUMP AT LOW FLOWS AND HOW BEST TO

DETERMINE MINIMUM FLOW.

PUMP SCHOOL

RON ASTALL

FIG 1: HEAD VS. FLOW

FIG 2: FLOWDISTRIBUTION

FLOW

IDEAL FLOW

DISTRIBUTION

DISTORTED FLOW

REVERSAL VORTEXING

HEAD

HIGH TEMP RISE

LOW FLOW CAVITATION

REDUCED BEARING AND SEAL LIFE

COURTESY PIA AUSTRALIAN PUMP TECHNICAL HANDBOOK

REDUCED IMPELLER LIFE

SUCTION RECIRCULATION

DISCHARGE RECIRCULATION

CAVITATION DUE TO

LACK OF NPSHA

BEP

PREFERRED

SELECTION

ZONE

BEP

LOWFLOW