Previous Page  76 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 76 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

76

PLUMBING CONNECTION

AUTUMN 2016

REDUCING THE “RE” FACTOR TO

BENEFIT CODE USERS

THE ABCB EXPLAINS THE DECISION TO MOVE TO A THREE-YEAR AMENDMENT CYCLE FOLLOWING NCC 2016.

I

f you have been in the building and construction industry

for a while, you might remember the days when the Building

Code of Australia (BCA) was amended every SIX months.

Between 1990 and 1996, the BCA was amended irregularly

but generally twice per year. With the introduction of the

performance-based BCA96, amendments were made in

January and July each year. From BCA 2004, the pace of

code amendments slowed somewhat with a move to annual

amendments that took effect from 1 May each year.

The Plumbing Code of Australia

(PCA), first published by the

National Plumbing Regulators

Forum in 2004, remained

unamended (but not nationally

adopted) until it joined the

National Construction Code (NCC)

series in 2011. Since then, the PCA

like the BCA has been amended

every year.

Code changes can be a double-

edged sword. On the one hand,

they can be seen as keeping the

code relevant and contemporary

and adopting a continuous

improvement approach. On the

other hand, code changes can

place significant burdens on code

users; burdens that manifest

themselves in the time and money

spent on retraining, redesigning, rewriting, reviewing, redoing

and a host of other “re”s.

It would be wrong to expect that a document like the NCC

should never change. Over time, code changes are necessary

to respond to emerging issues, changing practices and new

technologies. The challenge is getting the balance right so that

these changes occur in a way that allows code users to keep

up (and comply as intended) and avoids industry constantly

being in “re” mode.

Feedback received by the ABCB from individual code users,

industry bodies and other sources clearly said that annual

code changes did not achieve that balance. For example, a

NSW parliamentary inquiry into building practice stated, “A key

problem for building practitioners is that the Building Code is

too frequently changed and amended.” Another source stated,

“Certifiers have to take on the role of educators because of

rapid changes in the building code”. Under an annual code

amendment cycle, the public comment draft of the next

edition is released just one month after the current edition is

enacted.

Regular readers of the ABCB’s Australian Building

Regulation Bulletin (ABRB) will be familiar with the ABCB’s

Next Instalment of Building Regulatory Reform which includes

making the NCC free of charge for online users, and a suite

of reforms to reduce red tape,

improve housing affordability and

lower construction costs. A key

part of these reforms is the move

from an annual NCC amendment

cycle to a three-year amendment

cycle.

A decision to move to a three-

year amendment cycle following

NCC 2016 was taken by the

Building Ministers’ Forum at

its meeting on 30 May 2014. In

taking this decision, the BMF

recognised that there still needed

to be a mechanism for making

code changes in exceptional

circumstances, for example,

to respond to urgent safety

and health risks. These “out-

of-session” code changes will

be subject to strict criteria and can only be made following

support of the majority of members of the Board of the ABCB.

The 2016 edition of the NCC is being finalised for enactment

from 1 May 2016. This will be the last edition of the NCC under

the annual amendment cycle. This means that under a three-

year amendment cycle, the next scheduled edition will be NCC

2019.

For further information on the NCC amendment cycle, please

contact the ABCB office at

http://www.abcb.gov.au/en/about- the-australian-building-codes-board/contact-us.aspx

Australian Building Codes Board

www.abcb.gov.au